Dingedi vs PrestaHero modules (for translation and custom ChatGPT prompts)

[30knees]

I'm looking at two modules that handle translations and customer ChatGPT prompts:

Dingedi: https://addons.prestashop.com/en/international-localization/48962-translate-all-free-and-unlimited-translation.html Demo: https://psdemo1.dingedi.com/admin-demo/index.php

Prestahero: https://addons.prestashop.com/en/international-localization/50066-free-translate-ai-content-google-deepl-chatgpt.html Demo: https://demo2.presta-demos.com/translate/adminrgil8w/

Does anybody have experience with either module or the quality and support of the developers?

[wakabayashi]

I don't have any experience with this modules, but I am interested in the topic too. I am not mainly interested in the translation part, but in generating texts like meta title, meta description...

IMO it's important to note that Prestahero is only compatible with PS 1.7-8. It's very very unlikely that you even can use this module with tb.

Edited September 26 by wakabayashi

[30knees]

1 hour ago, wakabayashi said:

IMO it's important to note that Prestahero is only compatible with PS 1.7-8. It's very very unlikely that you even can use this module with tb.

Good catch. It showed up in the Prestashop Marketplace filter 1.6 but the module page itself does not mention 1.6. I asked and they confirmed it is NOT compatible with 1.6. So that leaves only the Dingedi module. Or have you come across others?

Dingedi wrote:

Quote

Our module allows you to change the query used for chatgpt. Our module is translation oriented but you can change the query according to your needs but there is no system to save multiple query and choose one to use. But we take note of your suggestion.

They also said they have many thirtybees customers and the module should work fine.

[wakabayashi]

19 hours ago, 30knees said:

They also said they have many thirtybees customers and the module should work fine.

I have my doubts 😅 Talking about "many"...

I don't know how many merchants here are interested in something like this. We had once this topic:

 

[the.rampage.rado]

I was going to purchase a CGPT module but then I tried generating the descriptions myself - OK, English is 90% human, there are some quirks (it likes to use 'crafted' A LOT!, like I'm selling a diablo 2 potions or something...). But when you give it a small list of forbidden words it's OK, at times it stops using the memory and you have to give the instructions again, but it's decent. Things don't sit that well for Bulgarian, my main website language - where nearly every sentence has to be touched by human, it uses a metric ton of foreign words, that simply are not used in Bulgarian, bit it's easier to substitute 1:1 than to invert the whole sentence so it sounds humanly written.

Yes, I'm using CGPT as a tool now but I read every result and if I'm not happy I touch up. If I do this with 500 products at once I will get mad fixing everything.

The tool saves me time in another way - I have products from a catalog, it contains some bullet points for every product but not enough, I give the bot instructions to format this input text as I want, modify it, give me a html code in two languages, add text that is not present on every product or play according to additional input per product. Something that could not be done easily in bulk description generation.

[30knees]

On 9/28/2024 at 11:19 PM, the.rampage.rado said:

The tool saves me time in another way - I have products from a catalog, it contains some bullet points for every product but not enough, I give the bot instructions to format this input text as I want, modify it, give me a html code in two languages, add text that is not present on every product or play according to additional input per product. Something that could not be done easily in bulk description generation.

Formatting tasks and translation would be my main use case for a module.

Good to hear your experience with generating descriptions.

I use ChatGPT to extract text from images (eg tables with data) and give me the equivalent HTML code to insert.

[30knees]

Update: I’m using the Dingedi module. Unfortunately, custom prompts are extremely poor compared to using the same prompt in the web interface.

The developers say it’s because API results can differ to the web interface and it’s not the module that is at fault but the prompts via API.