30knees

I just tested and I can confirm it:

It is what the ad agency wrote. There must be a setting somewhere.

The problem was that Google was also crawling the page and taking those images instead of the ones in the feed. Crawling is now deactivated and the images are being correctly pulled from the feed.

Thank you, @x97wehner! I realised when downloading your XML that I can check the links provided in the feed. And they're fine. So I don't understand why Google is complaining / or even how Google is getting the wrong image size.

Hi @datakick, For some products (not all), it looks like the datakick feed is sending a tiny image preview to Google Merchant Center instead of the original. How can I fix this? Also, is there a way to automatically send shipping costs per country to Google Merchant Center? Thanks

Because each combination has a unique reference ID that can be used. Or are we misunderstanding each other?

I'm also using Matomo. The ad agency will pass data from Matomo to Google. They wrote this to explain why GTM is still necessary. What do you think?

Do you use it with Google Tag Manager by any chance? If so, how did you integrate the banner and GTM so the banner blocks GTM until consented?

Did you ever get around to implement this?

But this does not address the problem of the required fields, if I understand you correctly? But I could try to make those elements not required. I would rather not mess around with the core if not necessary, though.

Is there a way to only update the impact on weight and impact on dimensions of combination products without adding the required fields of Attribute (Name:Type:Position)* and Value (Value:Position)* to the CSV? Or, as a workaround, can I export all combinations so they already have the required fields? Because adding the required fields manually is equally if not more labour intensive than adding the weight and dimensions manually.

@musicmasterAs it's not clear from the title of the post that it's about Prestools.

Some type of tooltip hint for this could be helpful. I was going to report the same but saw the post. For the pack-combination, I don't see the virtual attribute to select for the "parent" combination. Or do we create it ourselves? Currently, I would create an attribute "Pack of products" and select that so customers have some information. Also, would it be possible to show the total price of the individual combinations compared to the pack price (or is that a theme thing and indepdent of the feature)? Still testing ...

Lexoffice klappt soweit gut und die Kosten sind auch OK. Eine andere Lösung wäre Collmex. Flexibler als Lexoffice aber ohne KI-Schnickschnack.

With some work, yes.

Gladly!

Maybe someone else like datakick can update it if the developer doesn't reply.

I think we are a very small community and there's a good chance nobody uses it. You can see about either having someone update the v1 module with what's required or see whether v2 module can be made compatible. And then perhaps make your module public. :)

Sometimes I get orders where the billing and shipping addresses are in different countries, like so: Billing address: Germany. Shipping address: Italy. Product total: 100. Shipping costs to Germany would be 2.50. Shipping costs to Italy would be 10. Invoice and order total: 100, so shipping costs of 0 (no idea where the 0 comes from). Actual amount deducted from customer via PayPal: 110, so product price plus shipping to Italy. Has anybody else noticed something like this?

It's still quite a bit down the road, but if thirtybees wants to stay somewhat relevant for EU merchants, these developments on a Member State and EU level need to be taken into account. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/news/adoption-vat-digital-age-package-2025-03-11_en

It's design stuff and I know datakick prefers not to do such. :)

I should have been clearer. I meant his business, dh42.

And old topic but is Lesley still active? I contacted him via dh42 but no reply.

Is it developed enough to test in production stores or not yet?

That was a helpful hint, thank you. I have figured out that it was not the criteria but certain languages that were missing a translation in the core folder of Revws. The translations for Revws were registered only in the theme folder but not in the core folder (I don't understand when one needs to have translations of modules in the core and when in the theme folder). I've updated the translations for the core and now everything works.