Jump to content

Welcome, Guest!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

rubben1985

Members
  • Content Count

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by rubben1985

  1. thanks @Wartin what is the TB file that I should modify following this instructions? This one? /themes/theme/order-address.tpl
  2. Yes, it was another module messing up
  3. it seems it could be another module (about discounts) that inyects the code when i delete the product. i will keep you posted
  4. no OPC, the 3 steps What I do not understand is that the code has included a comment to hide some sections. But when the product is deleted, is like these comments does not exist, they disappear what is not logic unless there is another TPL that is loaded :S
  5. The checkbox is "use the same address" so it should hide the repeating address. But If you see, this bug also affects the opposite (check the video how marking the checkbox each time makes the opposite. It only matter what was last settting, not if was marked or unmarked)
  6. I hope someone can help me because I do not know what more to do... The order details seems to have 2 problems: 1- It seems if I delete a product, the visualization changes (does it use another tpl file ?) and it does not apply some of the changes I did to the tpl.... How is this even possible? The change of state also affect to other modules like Visual composer that lose a lower banner I have. The only explanation I find is that is using another tpl that do not include my modification and either the VC hook... 2- I can only delete one product before having to reload. Any idea? it is very annoying for the customers... i recorded a video of the 2 issues: https://www.loom.com/share/7613cc0f555a4b628eeb4ef90f137f39 I am with this problem for more than 1 month and I do not know what more to do
  7. If you want same adress is good to show only one, that is correct. The problem is that each time you go out of the section that makes that "state" the one that only shows one address (does not matter if you want both adress to be the same or not) Go to 0:20 sec in the video. You can see how I mark: "use same adress for invoice and shippin"g and this makes to show "two adresses" even if that usually means to show only one (it makes this because previously i unmarked and went back) It is very confusing to explain :S
  8. 3 steps checkout from @toplakd
  9. Hi, I just discovered a bug in the address step. The check button on "same invoice address" does have some troubles because can be activated and sometimes it shows both address and sometimes hide the repeated one. I discovered it seems to change the behavior each time we enter in this step keeping the "actual state" as the option that hides the second address. I mean: if use same address was activated, entering an unchecking the box will show the second address-> this is correct. But if we uncheck, go back and forward, "checking" the box, will show this time the second address. As it is complicate to understand we recorded a video: https://www.loom.com/share/7969460c80fe4517ac3721cdf177e3b6 You can see the wrong behavior in second 22 Note: I am not sure if hiding the address when "use same" checkbox is activated is the natural behavior or it was a modification we made here in the forum.
  10. rubben1985

    TB Project Plan

    That can happen becuase it can be mixed with other posts. Maybe its own section? I would suggest that updates like this (kind of changelog at the end) could be together with updates changelog and future developments/roadmap, could be a fixed section in the website. Anyone that wants to check if this are moving, and what to expect, could go there.
  11. I'm talking about the messages that customer let in the comments box (next to address). Do you receive them? also, I realized customers can pass the second step (shipping) without checking the box of conditions. If I activate this in the preferences section, condiciones field appear but it is not mandatory to accept them. Does someone have the same problem? any idea how to correct it?
  12. Indeed I have this problem too. I realized messages are not being stored /I do not receive them. Any idea how to solve this?
  13. I think including it as core features with a "contribution" mention in the module interface could be a good option if the developers agree.
  14. a mi también me pasa, y se me generan carros con 1 producto, luego otro con 2 productos... varios de ellos de los mismos clientes. No tengo explicación salvo que la persona haya vaciado el carro y se queda el registro. Yo lo he "parcheado" diciendole al modulo de carrito abandonado que solo cuente carros de minimo 2 productos. A ver si alguien puede aclarar este tema. Quizás en inglés haya más ayuda
  15. only to purchase the license 🙂 I used tunnelbear that is free and have indian server
  16. My two cents is to invest a little in a good seo tool. Free is ok, but you have to have higher knowledge and also combine a few (limited) tools. Time is money too. Semrush is great but very expensive. However there is a more simpler tool (but is improving day by day) called Ubersuggest that has an incredible offer as you can pay for lifetime licence. It is 490$ but using an indian proxy you can have it for 120$ (lifetime) as price it is based on country. In my opinion this price is amazing and I totally recommend it.
  17. deactivating it create a problem? That is strange I think. Usually i deactivate those compression (and cache) options when I have some bug...
  18. @RabbitZzZ try putting the ccc option like this It happened the same to me and it was because a module and having all the options active at the same time
  19. So you think it is better to turn off PS cache, and only use a module? Or not to use nothing at all? My experiments with the modules were that they increase speed indeed... maybe because of a bad server config, but those were the results...
  20. @zen also possible to completely turn down the cache system if that allows to use external modules (right now is not possible) About being faster without cache, surely you are right because you are have bigger expertise, but all the PS websites I tried before were faster with the cache modules.
  21. I was going to write some considerations in the feature topic, but maybe here is more correct to let that topic only for features: -the most critical for me is fixing the modules incompatibility with TB if a user detect it (not depending only on forum but kind of official support. Datakick offering something similar but just saying) - Improve the appearance of the TB home and CMS, image is very important to show something is alive and improving. My 2cnts: directly imitate the big ones (claims, designs, sections...) and once you have it, give your own personality. - not to include to much free stuff in addition to the actual version. Modules have to be sold at the end too 😉 . I prefer to pay for modules that having TB with low income. - Idea: if any developer do not want to sell their module in TB marketplace because they are not going to give support, you can just advertise them for free in the marketplace with a link to their website if you can help guaranteeing compatibility. This indicate to merchant that those modules are compatible and you increase "your marketplace richness". Sure you are giving free ad but you earn people knowing there are a lot of modules compatible with TB (believe me, TB guarantee compatibility is my continuous fear when buying new modules in PS marketplace)
  22. My personal requests: 1- Full Cache system repaired. I know Datakick is not a big fun of cache in ecommerce for the dynamic elements but it is of big help for speed. Sure cache can create issues with dynamic elements but they can be selected to be not cached. I do not need to much more in addition to this, correcting bugs and of course continue evolving the technology. I also have considerations but I will not put them here to only have listed features in this topic 🙂
  23. @datakick Great! the same announcement followed by this would have been totally different 🙂 Good to hear!
×
×
  • Create New...