colorful-ant Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 I'm looking for weeks for a solution. now i found it. Sorry for german pictures - i think @traumflug understands it and can help to ad change for the next update aeuc module :O i´m using https://www.seobility.net/de/seocheck/ to check without changes . . with changes my changes: modules / advancedeucompliance / views / templates / hook / hookDisplayProductPriceBlock.tpl <a href="{$smartyVars.ship.link_ship_pay}" class="iframe" title="Übersicht Versandkosten"> to (rel="nofollow") <a href="{$smartyVars.ship.link_ship_pay}" class="iframe" title="Übersicht Versandkosten" rel="nofollow"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the.rampage.rado Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Nice tool! Thank you, I'll scout my new project with it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the.rampage.rado Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Btw - I'm getting the same notification all over the place - homepage, categories, etc... And I'm not using AEUC just every link is red. What does it mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorful-ant Posted October 23, 2018 Author Share Posted October 23, 2018 @the-rampage-rado aeuc module have dynamic parameters ( url with ? etc....) if you try seo-tools - e.g. https://www.seobility.net/en/seocheck/ result (first image obove german, now english) . . it has nothing to do with the cache on this topic -> bo-performance-full page cache, you can find it in an other topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakabayashi Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Nice! I am using seobility as well :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedalman Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 I made changes to line 55 but it seems I did it wrong. Please have alook and tell me: {* "Shipping CMS content" Price Hook templating *} {if isset($smartyVars.ship) && isset($smartyVars.ship.link_ship_pay) && isset($smartyVars.ship.ship_str_i18n)} {$smartyVars.ship.ship_str_i18n|escape:'htmlall'} {/if} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakabayashi Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Why do you think it's wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorful-ant Posted October 24, 2018 Author Share Posted October 24, 2018 @pedalman it looks ok - have you clear the cache Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedalman Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Sure, cache was deleted but no change in seo site's info on internal links (as in your screenshot). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorful-ant Posted October 24, 2018 Author Share Posted October 24, 2018 my complete snippet {* "Shipping CMS content" Price Hook templating *} {if isset($smartyVars.ship) && isset($smartyVars.ship.link_ship_pay) && isset($smartyVars.ship.ship_str_i18n)} <div class="aeuc_shipping_label"> <a href="{$smartyVars.ship.link_ship_pay}" class="iframe" title="Versandkosten" rel="nofollow"> {$smartyVars.ship.ship_str_i18n|escape:'htmlall'} </a> </div> {/if} you can delete title="Versandkosten" or rename, or change for different languages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorful-ant Posted October 24, 2018 Author Share Posted October 24, 2018 a few days ago i also changed the revws module - @datakick httpdocs / modules / revws / views / templates / widgets / list / paging.tpl from <a href="{revws::getPageUrl($reviewList, 1)}" class="revws-page-next{if $reviewList.page >= $reviewList.pages-1} revws-disabled{/if}"> to <a href="{revws::getPageUrl($reviewList, 1)}" class="revws-page-next{if $reviewList.page >= $reviewList.pages-1} revws-disabled{/if}" rel="nofollow"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
datakick Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 You guys know that thirtybees implements canonical url tags by default, right? So why bother doing all this stuff? The only reason behind this rel="nofollow" suggestion is to get rid of duplicate content warnings (or is there any other reason?). But this is very stupid method to achieve this task, if you ask me. You need to fix all links on your page. If you miss just one, you will get this duplicate warning. Also, if any third party website links to your site using dynamic parameters, you'll get duplicate warnings as well -- you will have to manually block these third party links in your search console. It's a lost battle... Canonical url meta tags, on the other hand, solve this problem elegantly and permanently. When google tries to index url with dynamical parameters, this meta tag tells him that he should index is under different / canonical url. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colorful-ant Posted October 26, 2018 Author Share Posted October 26, 2018 I also like to learn ..... But I think it's not a lost fight. And duplicate warning is one of the problems from my own point of view. Everyone is always talking about Google - as the market leader. What about all the other search engines etc. Apart from that, some search engines do not adhere to various rules and settings. Some are just aggressive and include everything in their index. (Please do not talk about locking them.) It was just a suggestion, people who do not want to use it - do not have to do it. For me personally, after the change of all internal links dynamic parameters, a better position in the search engines resulted. When I install a new TB shop, without the additional modules required for me, such as AUEC, no problems with internal left dynamic parameters appear in an SEO query. etc..... I do not want to expand the topic because I probably lack too much experience and knowledge. It's my point of view and my experience when I do online SEO testing on different sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now