wakabayashi

I just had the same thing. Maybe the solution will help other merchants, who land here: For me it was solved after going into the SSL settings and switch them on...

@datakick yeah I agree. But I sounds like a little effort for them, or not? They check if the "Reward Module" is installed. If its installed, they show a tab in backoffice where merchant can set up the "points" for the action. Let'y say X points for a review. When a review is approved/posted the "review module" returns an array to the actionhook. If it works like that, it's doesn't cost the dev a lot of time. It all depends if the "Reward Module" is requested by a lot of merchants.

The idea is to have a flexible system, which can reward different events. You ask for the event "review". Other merchants want to give points for a "newsletter signup". That's why the points feature, shouldn't be integrated in the review module. It needs to me a standalone module, which offers a hook, that can be used by other module devs. I hope that is technically possible!?

@SLiCK_303 Please check out my post above. I really believe, we should distinguish between "Review Module" and a "Reward Module".

@datakick oh cool. Sorry it's a bit offtopic: My view on points is a bit different. I think it's better to have a module "customer points". This modules handles the points. There you can define, what users get for the points and so on. This module would offer an action hook, which can be used from other modules. Like a review module. But could also be an Image Upload module or a testimonial module. You see my point? Back to your offer. I would appreciate a nice product review module as well ;)

@datakick very nice idea! what is meant with "Points for Reviews module"?

@tomik said in Different Resource Served with and Without www in url: because he changed the website to abc.com :laughing: :D :D :D I shouldn't answer in the morning ;)

Hey. For me both links are not working...

@Tomik My best tip: only use modules you really need. If you have modules installed, which you don't use, they will slow down your store. They can also make conflicts. So to answer your question, you should become more specific, what functions you need.

Not sure if I understand you right. Basically you need to watch, that every product has it's own url.

is one of the url there, which you have the problems?

@zimmer-media said in White Space Error: https://forum.thirtybees.com/topic/537/index-404-error-after-ps-1-6-1-1-migration/11 "Our migrator does not add them automatically. Its a bug in our migrator. What you will have to do is go to Administration -> Menus and add them manually. For the duplicate urls add what is in the image below. http://storage9.static.itmages.com/i/17/0714/h15000439488281976_ddfa38dca4.png For the css page add what is in this image. http://storage4.static.itmages.com/i/17/0714/h15000440297213616_9e78921359.png Have you checked out the thirty bees developer blog? Want to try thirty bees? Launch a free thirty bees trial on Cloudways" Thx I didn't know about this. I just tried to add them. But it failed: Unable to load template file 'controllers/duplicate_urls/duplicates.tpl There seem to be any file missing. @mdekker will this menu points be added by auto in next version?

@zimmer-media thx! I havne't tested it yet, but I like the idea behind it.

@lesley said in Change Product Add Date to affect New: There are lots of hidden things in the code... Like easter eggs. hahah :D who can find them :)

Hm I am very surprised that is working. How can it without changing any php file? Btw I have coded a very similair function in an internal module... In other words: I also would like to see this in core ;)

@dprophitjr very nice to see you back here. I have no idea about wikipedia, but all I hear is similair to what @mdekker says...

@lesley dont worry, I understood you right. I know, that you want to fix. Actually you wrote, what I meant. In the asm you would have to invest at least a week, to have a decent system. Thats why I really hope Michael and you can work fulltime on it. Otherwise it's very hard to fix this things.

@traumflug said in 19 Patron ?!: thirty bees' track record of fixing issues in a timely fashion is pretty good, IMHO. Regularly, only a couple of hard to diagnose bugs survive more than a few days. PS' bug tracker is full of issues unresolved for years, so people might have simply given up on discussing them. Small Bugs are fixed fast. But deep bugs in case of multistore or asm aren't. The argument, that very few use it, is understandable, but doesn't help. Especially in asm it's no wonder. You just can't use asm as a normal merchant. I am sure every merchants who test asm for some hours, will stay away. That's the reason, why I say, that I see no future, if guys like you, Michael and Lesley can't work fulltime on it. The project needs a few people who can rewrite big parts of the software. It takes undoubtly a lot of time to fix asm or to implement a new stock managament. I can't expect it, to be fixed in your freetime...

@30knees we have same problems. I also can't understand, why it is not added. You can cancel the order and afterwards delete it, with a free module: https://mypresta.eu/modules/administration-tools/delete-orders-free.html

One problem of TB is, that it should be compatible with PS 1.6 modules. This makes a lot of wishful changes in the core impossible, right? I wonder, if its possible to transform in steps to "no compability". Pamyent modules are very important. So this modules should be compatible as long as possible. But there are modules which aren't very important or which can be easily rewritten. Development of TB shouldn't be hindered of any stupid "facebook like box" module. You get my question now?

@Briljander Yeah I believe local modules like shipping and payment are the most critical. Since there is often just one dev. @lesley is it no idea to break compability in parts. Let's say some theme related modules will be broken quite soon, but payment and shipping modules will longer be compatible?

@DavidP with the "store" he means a store for modules! @alwayspaws it is no problem, if you can't support with money. You support with a lot of acitvity here, reporting bugs and so on. Thats very helpful for all here! The discussion is about merchants who make 1000$/month and just don't support in any way.

I don't understand your answer :S Maybe my point was also not clear enough. I wanted to say: People who are on shared hosting, have just no cents left. I doubt they can/will afford any algolia service. A VPS is very cheap nowdays. Still a lot are on shared...

@lesley said in 19 Patron ?!: We are trying to work out a deal with Algolia now, for users that cannot set up their own Elastic instance to be able to have another search module choice. I am note sure, if this is the right strategy... Why would somehow stay on a shared hosting, but then invest money in algolia?

@vincentdenkspel yeah but couldn't we say that even more about modules like: blog or mailchimp?