-
Posts
3,106 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
479
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Articles
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by datakick
-
It looks like full page cache is disabled (unless you use multistore, and the settings for other store is different). That would suggest that the issue is not in thirtybees core, but in the module's caching, if it use any.
-
Very strange. I can't reproduce this problem -- I run this module on my demo account, in production on store, and on localhost without any issues or problems. I guess there must be some settings or module you guys are using that interfere with the module. Is anyone willing to give me back office access so I could investigate more?
-
@spidawebs that looks like some rewriting issue -- my module's controller is never triggered, there seems to be conflict in thirtybees routing. Could you give me access to your back office, so I could investigate?
-
Oh, that will be the the case. You should be able to access the checkout page by entering this to browser nav www.yourdomain.com/index.php?fc=module&module=chex&controller=checkout
-
That is weird. Do you have temporary license key in License tab?
-
-
Yeah, this was *almost* completed for a few months now, and I finally put aside some time to finish it 🙂 I'd like to implement some more features to this module, however I will wait to see how many merchants are interested in this... Unlike my other modules, this is tb/ps16 only, so I guess sales / usage will be significantly lower.
-
I've just completed this module for production mode. You can download trial version on my store
-
There is Edit: I should maybe mention that it's necessary to look at page source. If you use chrome/firefox inspect mechanism, you are looking at current page DOM structure, and that can be very different from the page served (all the jquery and other javascript DOM modification stuff)
-
Missing item reviewed is not problem with my module, but rather with your theme. More specifically, layout of your product page, and the placement where review widget is located. You can check that results for my demo page are just fine: https://search.google.com/test/rich-results?id=HLbwUbGKze0FoB1ZZAh3hg revws module is NOT responsible for emitting metadata about product, that is theme's job. Most themes, of course, output product metadata to the page. And I'm sure your theme does as well. The problem problably is that review widget is not placed inside <div> element that describes product. Valid example -- rating metadata are within <div> with with itemtype=https://schema.org/Product, so google can associate reviews / ratings with this particular product. <div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Product"> <!-- html markup for product detail --> <h1 itemprop="name">Product name</h1> ... <!-- html markup for review widget --> <div itemprop="aggregateRating" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/AggregateRating"> <span itemprop="ratingValue">3.92</span> <span itemProp="worstRating">1</span> <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> <span itemprop="reviewCount">7</span> </div> </div> Invalid example -- rating metadata are not within Product div, so google have problems linking these two information together. Note that there may be multiple Products on one page, or other metadata elements like Offer or Job, so google can't and don't automatically associate these two distinct set of metadata <div itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Product"> <!-- html markup for product detail --> <h1 itemprop="name">Product name</h1> </div> <!-- html markup for review widget --> <div itemprop="aggregateRating" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/AggregateRating"> <span itemprop="ratingValue">3.92</span> <span itemProp="worstRating">1</span> <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> <span itemprop="reviewCount">7</span> </div> Revws module let you choose one of the two hooks to render widget into. But where in the page are these hooks rendered is sole responsibility of theme.
-
There's no such option in the module, you would have to make modification
-
It's unlikely that it would take weeks, but I guess it's possible in case that the dns records had large TTL before. But usually dns propagation take hours/days at most. Good news is that it's possible to resolve the dns records from my location now. So maybe the dns propagated, or the tech support did something that fixed that (I would bet on this one). So maybe the integration with your carrier will now work.
-
I would contact your host and ask them how it's possible that the dns records can't be resolved from some locations. It is quite likely that they have some firewall in front of *name servers* that blocks requests from certain locations, making your website non-existent for part of the internet. If they can't fix this, change nameservers. For example, go for cloudflare.
-
btw, it's not possible to resolve your dns address edit: I've just run some tests on your domain: u-bolts-r-us.co.uk 1) domain name can't be resolved to IP address from my location (Czech republic) 2) domain name can be resolved from my VPS located in Frankfurt 3) domain name can be resolved from my VPS located in New York That's quite weird, and should not happen.
-
Look into your server's access log and search for access to webservice endpoint. If there are no entries, then the problem is most probably at carrier side.
-
Yep, bleeding edge / 1.0.x / release preview are just different names for the same 🙂
-
it is already solved in the upcoming version. If you don't want to wait, use coreupdater do forward your site to release preview
-
Do you have delivery delay(days) option set to non-zero value? If so, then the email will be send +N days after the order is marked as 'shipped'. If you don't want this feature, simply set this option to zero...
-
That's definitely a bug, thanks for reporting this. I've filled github issue to track this: https://github.com/thirtybees/thirtybees/issues/895
-
I personally think that @Scully is right, device type should definitely be in page key dimension, because server *can* generate different content for different devices. Caching mechanism should not change rendering logic in any way, it should only cache the output. It should be consistent - the server should return the same page with or without cache being enabled. And that's not the case when device type does not take any part in decision process. We could be smart about this, and consider different device types only when there is *some* module that is not enabled on some device.
-
Maybe you have revws module disabled on mobile devices?